Haha it's cool man, psych talk is always interesting. You study psychology? If so, PSYCH MAJORS UNITE!
And yeah, the article is a little overly Freudian, which raises some flags for sure, but I do think at least some of what it says (ex. the movement of love from passionate to companionate) is based on more empirical data.
The article is far from useless! I think, as with most psychoanalysis, it has either many reasonable premises or conclusions, but usually not both at the same time, if that makes any sense.
I can see how many of the things mentioned in this article relate to my social psychology book, but it's written in a rather different context, with some premises or conclusions swapped with something less scientific sound.



