elvendio wrote:Nam Taf wrote:elvendio wrote:No wav. files are the best actually they are the original recordings and always the best quality don't downgrade to flak. Big is good because the audio quality. I wish all music was available in wav. files with today's hard drive space.
Thanks so much I can't wait to hear this!
FLAC is 100% lossless. That is, there is no information loss. Converting a file from WAV to FLAC and back to WAV will result in a completely identical (try it and SHA-1 or MD5 or CRC32 it) file, so long as you don't add ID3 tags or the like. There is absolutely no change whatsoever.
I don't think you quite grasp what FLAC is about or indeed have much knowledge about 'audio quality' as a general principle.
Yes FLAC is very good and while not completely lossless it is losslessy. When you compress the file to FLAC you partially damage the file. When yopu play back the FLAC file you essentially are playing the same wav file back but it's not perfect.With a good set of monitors and a good ear you can easily hear the difference.
Try recording a flack file in Wavelab then the same wav file and compare the difference when you stretch out the wav. Not completely identical same are they. FLAC is very good and I use it myself and is often said to be identical to wav. It's close but not identical.
Please feel free to flame me some more.
No FLAC is Lossless as in without loss. As in sounds exactly the same. As in is exactly the same information. No. Just no.
"Notable features of FLAC:
Lossless: The encoding of audio (PCM) data incurs no loss of information, and the decoded audio is bit-for-bit identical to what went into the encoder. Each frame contains a 16-bit CRC of the frame data for detecting transmission errors. The integrity of the audio data is further insured by storing an MD5 signature of the original unencoded audio data in the file header, which can be compared against later during decoding or testing."
'I didn't mean to sound bitchy, should've used a smiley.' - Tracy