Post HevyDevy fan art, covers, mashups, guitar tabs, etc here
#155916 by scotthands
Sun Aug 05, 2007 7:19 am
I was trying to figure out how devin got that really cool delay sound, so i was playing around with some delays but i got carried away.

I came up with this weird sounding guitar track, it may take some time to listen to, it might be one of those things like devlab where you might just think it's weird.

It's a droning type of thing.
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemus ... dID=734362


i guess this is my introduction to the forum too, so. hello .

#155945 by Grimview
Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:12 pm
I've gotta agree with Josiah... that was cool. Nice, calming ambient stuff. :)

#155953 by djskrimp
Mon Aug 06, 2007 3:09 am
Thirded...quite liked it.

#155956 by Archetype
Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:07 am
It's nice, but I have got a few comments...

- Too much gain. You don't need that much gain; in fact, the more gain you use, the sloppier your sound gets and the less tone will be noticable (if this is a word). Especially in a live situation, it's important to keep your gain as low as possible, if you want to get the best guitar sound out your amp.

-Lower the feedback of the delay. I do like the delay itself, with the many repetitions, but the feedback is pretty high (I'm guessing 60%), which gives the delay a higher volume than the original sound. Ofcourse this is a matter of taste, but I always like it, when my original sound has the highest volume. With a good delay (TC 2220), this is no problem ofcourse, but with a shittier one, you will get some hisses in your delay, if you use a high feedback.

The rest is just good. It's original guitarplaying, using so much delay. Difficult to use in a band situation, I would guess.

#156006 by Grimview
Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:37 pm
Archetype wrote: noticable (if this is a word).

It is. :)

#156016 by djskrimp
Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:14 am
Grimview wrote:
Archetype wrote: noticable (if this is a word).

It is. :)


Only if spelled "noticeable"... ;)

#156019 by Keeker
Tue Aug 07, 2007 2:17 am
djskrimp wrote:
Grimview wrote:
Archetype wrote: noticable (if this is a word).

It is. :)


Only if spelled "noticeable"... ;)

I thought of correcting him but knew you'd probably get in first. :lol:

#156056 by djskrimp
Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:47 pm
Keeker wrote:
djskrimp wrote:
Grimview wrote:
Archetype wrote: noticable (if this is a word).

It is. :)


Only if spelled "noticeable"... ;)

I thought of correcting him but knew you'd probably get in first. :lol:


It worries me that when you think of someone doing things quickly, you think of me....

#156059 by Keeker
Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:17 am
djskrimp wrote:
Keeker wrote:
djskrimp wrote:
Grimview wrote:
Archetype wrote: noticable (if this is a word).

It is. :)


Only if spelled "noticeable"... ;)

I thought of correcting him but knew you'd probably get in first. :lol:


It worries me that when you think of someone doing things quickly, you think of me....

'Fret' ye not. (wince)

#156103 by Grimview
Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:37 pm
djskrimp wrote:
Grimview wrote:
Archetype wrote: noticable (if this is a word).

It is. :)


Only if spelled "noticeable"... ;)

... Fair point. Wasn't thinking. :P

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest