Page 1 of 1

SYL to be Wikipedia's front page article July 6

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:39 am
by gendralman
In case anyone cares...

I know, lame. Well, I think it's cool anyway. :P

link

Re: SYL to be Wikipedia's front page article July 6

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:30 am
by Biert
Cool.

I think we were discussing getting Dev and/or SYL up there, a few months ago.


EDIT: This is where I read it: viewtopic.php?p=188612#p188612

Besides, this belongs in the SYL section.

Re: SYL to be Wikipedia's front page article July 6

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:02 am
by Devymetalnut
Thats badass, Strapping deserve it bigtime, would be oooh so cool to see them play together again, even if it isn't the lad. Ah well I can only dream and wait for Addicted :wink:

Re: SYL to be Wikipedia's front page article July 6

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:44 pm
by CyclopZ
WOW! Worldwide event! :trumpet:

Re: SYL to be Wikipedia's front page article July 6

PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 1:12 am
by swervedriver
Why put a band that disbanded 3 years ago on the frontpage? Maybe I'm just silly but it'd make a lot more sense to me to put Devin Townsend there, since he's still very much active in making music. Or is that too much of a "free publicity" kind of thing that Wikipedia does not want to involve itself in?

Also, now you'll get a lot more "so when's SYL gonna have a reunion?" questions too... :roll:

Re: SYL to be Wikipedia's front page article July 6

PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 5:41 am
by CyclopZ
Long live SYL :D

Re: SYL to be Wikipedia's front page article July 6

PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:49 am
by allmyfriends
swervedriver wrote:Why put a band that disbanded 3 years ago on the frontpage? Maybe I'm just silly but it'd make a lot more sense to me to put Devin Townsend there, since he's still very much active in making music. Or is that too much of a "free publicity" kind of thing that Wikipedia does not want to involve itself in?

Also, now you'll get a lot more "so when's SYL gonna have a reunion?" questions too... :roll:


Because they don't put things there based on if there still around they put them there on the quality of the article I'm pretty sure.

Of course I could be wrong but there you go :D