Blazingmonga wrote:1) You go against the artist's wishes.
He doesn't want me to hear the album before I buy it? Why? Is there something wrong with it?
2) You potentially encourage or enable others to do the same, with no guarantee that they will have the same moral standpoint as you and may not purchase the final product.
I also potentially guide new fans in his direction.
3) You dispel/deflate the mystery and hype that surrounds a release, which may in turn harm sales (though thats a bit vague).
I actively try to take no or very little part in hypes of any kind. They're like tricking someone into buying a product he/she actually doesn't want or need (like factory torn jeans).
4) You make Devin sigh!
You make me sigh!

5) You pre-judge the album without seeing the complete package (intended quality/mix of audio, artwork, lyrics, notes and extras). Perhaps similar to only seeing one side of the argument in a courtroom.
The magic was still there when "Alien" finally came out and I got my copy in the mail. Besides, I don't judge music, I listen to it and experience it. I agree, though, that reviews based on downloaded material can prove "faulty".
6) You make the HDF moderators very sad. I cry into my mango every night!
It's a dirty job, but someone's got to do it...

8) The more digital/illegal copies of the album exist, the more people on release day there will be that have not yet bought the album. At this point, we are unable to tell if any one of these people ever intend to buy the album.
We are equally unable to tell if any one of those people never intend to buy it.
9) The more people who download the album illegally, the less people on release that are eager to buy the album. Less eager = less desperate = less good. Some people may not bother to buy the album due to a severe lack of eagerness. This would smelly.
That would depend on what they think of the music, right? I see nothing smelly in that people that don't like the music also don't buy it.
And that's it. What it all boils down to, is that artists in general lose out on the sales that traditionally went to people that "believed the hype". People who would buy an album, listen to it once and then leave it to gather dust in a corner of the room or under the bed. Dammit, I own two Korn albums! (See what I mean?)
To me, it would appear a better thing if every sold copy of Synchestra ended up in the possession of someone that really liked it, rather than someone who "believed the hype", went out and got themselves a copy and then just didn't feel the magic like we do.
They lose - Devin wins?
Not in the way I see it.