I am fully aware that not everybody will agree with my views, and I'm open to any challenges. If somebody can convince me to change my mind about something I'll admit my .. perhaps .. misconceptions and do so immediately. Just before I comment on the rather impressive statements already made on this thread.
Tren wrote:Its all about richard dawkins setting the record straight.
No, I don't like Richard Dawkins at all. He once said that if you have a faith you're insane. And I've never once heard him come up with a convincing argument to say God doesn't exist. I think it's good for children to be brought up with a faith, but it's their own decision whether or not they carry it on when they come to understand the world. This can be a very hard place to live in and sometimes I understand that people need something deeper. Dawkins is blatently intolerant of religion while never being able to adequately explain why.
Noodles wrote:Zyprexa wrote:But sometimes you have to ask yourself, whyever would you put your material existance in the present ahead of a life nobody can be absolutely sure of? If everyone's so certain God exists why do we even care about life?
Probably because they aren't agnostic, they are absolutely sure of it
But I can't comprehend how anyone can be absolutely sure of something they can't see and something which apparently rules over the world but yet lets wars and global warming and racism and violence co-exist with good people being affected as well as bad. People often tell me 'Think of a beautiful flower, a new baby. Now tell me something greater than you didn't create that.' And I say 'Think of a slug, eating the flower. Think of the new baby in Africa with a disease in its eye, making it go blind, and its parents knowing it will be impossible to feed. And tell me your God didn't create that slug, that parasite.'
Archetype wrote:I believe religion is evil, and the cause of 95% of all deaths and wars on the planet.
It's not really essentially evil. But fundamentalists (emphasis on the 'mental') have blown it out of all proportions. Muslims are particularly bad on this count. I mean, their 'blow up a street and everyone on it' policy is disgusting. Makes me want to get sick all over Sufi Muslims. And I love the principals of all religions, their desire to keep the masses in line, but this just went way out of hand. I mean, blowing someone else up so you become a 'martyr' and go to heaven? It's disgusting. The key is tolerance, acceptance that we're not all clones, thus we couldn't possibly all believe the same thing. As well as understanding that if somebody has a different religion to yours, they're not trying to defy Allah or God or Sidhartha Guatama (sp?), they're merely setting their own path of righteousness based on what somebody else said. What sickens me most is that all religions are essential the same principal, namely the 'Do unto others' idea.
Noodles wrote:I disagree. Religion is just a useful tool to pit humans against one another. I'm sure we'd find other things to fight over if it wasn't there. And there are plenty of people who still follow the 10 Commandments, you just don't hear about them because only raving lunatics are interesting enough for the news.
And as well, I'm sure most people know morally that it's wrong to steal (on a grand scale anyway), it's wrong to murder. And it's human nature to want something someone else has, so God can fuck right off on that count. But a lot of the other commandments are well outdated. I think honour thy father and mother was stuck in there to scare kiddies. I treat them equally to everybody else, I don't believe anybody is worthy of being placed above anyone.
Noodles wrote:My point of view is that religion should just be a private thing and organized religion is bad. Imo if there is a God it's probably something that doesn't care about humanity and that humans don't understand.
Yeah, organized religion has proven to be a global money-grabbing scheme. But I just don't feel the need to believe in a God, why should I think there's a higher power than humans? It's like celebrities, I have no time for them and their 'Look how great I am'-ism. I'm probably better than them in more ways than they could imagine, and I could easily become famous, I just really don't want that. Anyone could. Why should we look up to them? And give celebrities some credit, they're material things that we can actually see. And they're not definitely white men, unlike a certain God the Catholic Church like to portray.
the_scoon wrote:I do believe there is a spiritual world that co-exists in and amongst ours. Things we can't explain. I don't really call it God's work, so in that sense I'm not a religious person. I am definately a spiritual person though.
Being spiritual is logical. You create your own rules and boundaries as to what you believe in. Being devoutly religious, I feel, is being a sheep. You're going along with something that somebody told you to believe. I couldn't find solstice in an idea that another mortal conjured up for their own comfort.
Kivenkantaja wrote:7. I started to envy religious people because I fear death.
Why fear death? I like to think there's no higher power, that when we die we go into what seems like an eternal dream. You know that thing people do where you crouch down and take thirty really heavy breaths, then you stand up quickly and somebody presses on your chest cavity and your oxygen is momentarily cut off so you faint? You have a dream that goes on for what seems like an eternity and then you wake up and everybody is still standing around you, it's been around a second. I think we might go on dreaming like that when we die. Then other times I think we may end up as a dreamless, thoughtless, decaying corpse under the ground. It barely fazes me. I love the life I have, and have come to accept that death merely signifies the conclusion of it. All good things must come to an end.