mo wrote:physics is so much better than biology... but me being the fool I am, dropped it for Business Studies. SOOO SHIT. All because I got to my new school a few weeks later than everyone started and I wasn't assed to catch up.
I can relate to that, Mo. I love science but I am kind of a "pure" science Mongrel. I know just enough to make me sound intelligent/idiotic depending upon the audience I am talking to. If I had my way, I would have invested more of my education in Mathematics and less in the Arts. I feel that I would have been pretty good at it, but now I am in the health sciences, which tends to be almost the antithesis of pure science, I have to be concerned with how people feel.
I guess what interests me most about physics and astronomy is that it is more of a religious thing to me than any religion has ever been. To research one or the other, is to break down and analyze the minutia of the universe in order to infer the order of things and understand the hands of god. Okay I just got a little melodramatic, but what I am trying to say is that if I spent my time doing that, it would be pimp.
I made my choice, I will be Dr. Wiseblud in a little over a year, spending time fixing squealing hearing aids and talking to people about the ringing in their ears, secretly and insensitively screaming in my mind that they need to "man up" and stop mewling about things that they can not change.
Okay back on topic, as far as Schrödinger's cat is concerned and the fact that it takes an observation in order to collapse the supersposition of states dead cat/live cat ( particle/wave, like the interference pattern seen in the double slit experiment), I would have to say that as long as the cat was the observer, the gas would never be released. So the lesson for cats is this, if trapped in a box with a particle sensor and poison gas, it is best to sleep with one eye open.
In case you are wondering, yes I had a bad day and no I do not know that I am not making sense.