Talk about whatever you want to here, but stay correct

#134241 by Yanko
Sun Nov 26, 2006 5:37 pm
gozu wrote:
Yanko wrote:they actually said their next album is gonna have progressive rock influence.

They either will have a VERY GOOD producer with guts to take away 90% of their public, or they'll give me more reasons to punch each member in the face :P


hmmmmm muse, mastodon, the mars volta, opeth all bands with prog tendancies which are getting a lot of attention at the moment, i smell a bandwagon forming


well they're surely not PROG ROCK sounding
i mean, in the "style" called prog-rock. Like ELP, Yes or Gentle Giant or awesome shit like that.

#134254 by gozu
Sun Nov 26, 2006 6:54 pm
oooooohhhh ok then.... my flat mate makes me listen to gentle giant, if they sound anything like that its gonna be a WIERD album :D

#134287 by Yanko
Mon Nov 27, 2006 7:48 am
gozu wrote:oooooohhhh ok then.... my flat mate makes me listen to gentle giant, if they sound anything like that its gonna be a WIERD album :D


gentle giant ist krieg :twisted:

#134378 by Whiplash
Tue Nov 28, 2006 12:10 pm
Haha i heard this on the radio at work, totally made my day! :D
my colleagues all were like what the hell is he laughing about??

#135129 by Blodskur
Tue Dec 05, 2006 11:44 pm
Devon sounds like quite the masochist.

Stalking a singer that brings most most people pain.

#135162 by toad
Wed Dec 06, 2006 7:17 am
Yanko wrote:well they're surely not PROG ROCK sounding
i mean, in the "style" called prog-rock. Like ELP, Yes or Gentle Giant or awesome shit like that.


That's the age-old confusion in determining "progressive rock": Does it mean the musical style similar to that awesome shit in the seventies (=virtuoso musicianship, long and complex song structures, unusual time signatures and keys etc.), or the ideal of "progressive" music - seeking and implementing completely new and innovative ways of musical expression?

I seriously doubt Linkin Park will achieve neither anywhere in the near future.
Except maybe through "production".

#135165 by Yanko
Wed Dec 06, 2006 7:31 am
toad wrote:
Yanko wrote:well they're surely not PROG ROCK sounding
i mean, in the "style" called prog-rock. Like ELP, Yes or Gentle Giant or awesome shit like that.


That's the age-old confusion in determining "progressive rock": Does it mean the musical style similar to that awesome shit in the seventies (=virtuoso musicianship, long and complex song structures, unusual time signatures and keys etc.), or the ideal of "progressive" music - seeking and implementing completely new and innovative ways of musical expression?

I seriously doubt Linkin Park will achieve neither anywhere in the near future.
Except maybe through "production".


yeah, that's my point
just for "cataloguing" reasons, i totally differ PROG-ROCK from PROGRESSIVE ROCK :lol:

when i say prog-rock, i refer to stuff that sounds like the amazing shit in the seventies, when i say PROGRESSIVE rock i mean the ideal of experimenting and all. But i just call something PROGRESSIVE when it doesn't sound like shit, a ton of people actually stand things that sound like shit just because it's experimental :lol:

#136071 by Leechmaster
Sun Dec 17, 2006 6:41 am
dub wrote:http://www.popmatters.com/pm/features/article/8636/concept-albums-are-once-again-in-vogue-in-the-digital-age/

"Credit Green Day for launching the revival"
No.

#136077 by Yanko
Sun Dec 17, 2006 8:53 am
"qualify as concept albums in some sense."

"well, i kinda need to prove my point, so if you consider this and that thingy that go on on like 2 seconds of the album, and repeats on the other song, you can really like, you know, qualify it as a concept......in a sense.... i guess..... no? really? oh.... okay... but still....... "

:P

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests